Understanding Understanding
No, I didn't stutter with that title, although it may seem like a drunk stumbling
over his own feet. We study to understand, but we sometimes fail to really
understand what we have studied. I urge you to study scripture, but I also
urge you to study the background material relating to your study. We need
to know factors dealing with culture, language terms and other people
connected with the subject.
I'm going to describe how two seemingly similar sets of scripture may appear to
tell us the same story, but are quite different. You don't know about the difference
until you study the explanation derived by Christian bible scholars. Before I begin,
I want to tell you about God's sense of humor and how virtually nothing about
the minds of men have changed in hundreds of years.
If you doubt God's sense of humor, read the book of Esther. It would make a
great movie. In elementary school I learned about Alexander the Great. Hundreds
of years ago he went about conquering countries until he began to worry there
wouldn't be any left to conquer. He had a similar mindset as did a predecessor,
Xerxes, who also wanted to cross the Bosporus. He put together a large army of mostly slaves, and
marched them to the east bank of the Bosporus. This is a narrow strip of water only
about 800 yards wide that separates Asia from Europe and joins the Black Sea to
the Mediterranean Sea. It has a dual current, differing on the top and underneath.
This means it can be very roilly and difficult to cross.
When Xerxes wanted to send his troops across, the water was too rough, and
they couldn't go. Xerxes, like many political and/or religious leaders, was used to
having his way, and became infuriated. He gathered up chains and ordered the troops
to whip the water for not behaving. If you think times and education have changed
things, consider this event in 2012.
Global warming may be controversial, but many scientists have concluded that the
ice caps are melting. We are also experiencing a wide-spread drought that may be worse
than the dust bowl years. Scientists have warned that the ocean level may rise
significantly, creating problems for shore lines and cities. One state's legislature has
passed a law setting a limit on the ocean's rise. The political and "Christian" leaders
have determined they will dictate the earth's conditions. This is similar to a "Christian"
friend that says man will invent a more perfect food than God's choice of milk.
This is all to say our understanding isn't really understanding, and many of our political
and religious leaders are as clueless as Alexander was hundreds of years ago. How could
residents of a state not question their legislators? It's no wonder people don't understand
the bible. Now to our study of parables. We're going to be looking at background
information unlocking differences that aren't readily apparent. Remember, Christ told us
in Mark 4 and Luke 8 the purpose of parables. Matt. 13:11-13 (and Isaiah also explains
this) tells us, "Because it has been given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of
heaven, but to them it has not been given. For, whoever has, to him more will be given,
and he will have abundance; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken
away from him. Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see,
and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand."
There are some clues in Christ's statement we need to seriously consider as we
study the two parables in question. "For, whoever has, to him more will be given, and
he will have abundance." Christ is not speaking about money, and abundance here is
not material things. Christ is speaking about knowledge of the Word of God and
understanding the spiritual realm. Why do so many "Christians" hear these words
and immediately think of money and worldly goods? Perhaps they are putting their
honest thoughts of commitment to money rather than accepting Christ, salvation and
the spiritual gifts?
Let's complete Christ's explanation of the "mystery". "But whoever does not have, even
what he has will be taken away from him." You could jump to the conclusion that Christ is
speaking about money, but He is again referring to spiritual things--the gifts of the Holy
Spirit, the fruit of the Spirit. Christ is warning that if a believer doesn't use the gifts, they
will be taken away. We are warned not to hide our gifts under a basket (Matt. 5:13-16).
Matt. 6:24 tells us we cannot serve God and mammon. Our treasure is in heaven, not in
an earthly bank (Matt. 6:19-21).
Now you may see that many who read scripture instead of studying it will not have
understanding. We can now turn to the study of two similar parables. Matt. 25 tells the
Parable of the Talents, and Luke 19 gives us the Parable of the Minas. They are cross
referenced in many bibles, which can confuse us into thinking they cover the same
subject. This is another reason the parables remain a mystery to most. I have written
in a previous message that talents in the Math. 25 passage refer to fruits of the Spirit,
not money. I have been accused of putting a spin on scripture. To understand this
passage, we need to begin at verse 26. Keep in mind, Christ never taught anything
about cheating or stealing except it was WRONG.
Here, folks, in Matt. 25:26, is the first clue to solve the mystery of this parable. I'm
spending extra ink on this clue, because nearly all Christians fail to notice this clue
and its importance. The usual "Christian" interpretation of this parable is that it shows
God wants you to make a profit (money). Dozens of "Christians" have argued this point
with me, deliberately refusing to recognize this clue and the others. Money making rules
the day. How can any Christian accept the statement that the Father or Son would
encourage anyone to steal to make a profit? Can you accept this? There it is, right in
holy scripture. Do you value money over the Ten Commandments?
That's only the first and most glaring clue, so this isn't just an anti-money rant. We
go next to verse 30. If you are a Christian, you must believe that the Father and Son
are the only ones who can judge and banish anyone to outer darkness--Hell. How can
this wealthy man do something scripture tells us he can't do? Still, like the premise of
profit? Note also, throughout this parable the servants call this man by the title of Lord.
There's a cute entrapping twist to this parable concerning TALENT. That is a measure
of money. It represented about 6,000 denarii. A denarius represented about one day's
wage for the average working man. The wealthy man declares in verse 27 that the servant
should have deposited his talents with the bankers to receive a profit from the money
investment. At this point, you may have "bought in" on the money subject.
However, there's more. We know a talent can represent money, but we also should know
that a talent can be a spiritual gift bestowed upon us by God. If you study the New
Testament, you will know about these gifts, beginning with Acts 2:38, where the gift of
the Holy Spirit is given. But give yourself a treat and read Romans 12:4-8 and the other
references in several New Testament books.
What about the twist? The gifts of the spirit are also called talents. This wealthy man
has no power to bestow spiritual gifts. By using the word to talk about money rather than
spiritual values, we miss this clue, and accept the idea the entire parable is about wise
use of money, ignoring the other clues, especially the one in verse 26 where the wealthy
man admits his wealth is at least partly from stealing. I have heard Christian after Christian,
and politician after politician use this parable to push greed. Do you now understand what
Christ meant about mysteries?
We can move on to the second parable, the Parable of the Minas, Luke 19:11-27. This
parable seems to be a slightly different repeat of Matt., the Parable of Talents. This is an
entirely different setting, with a different major figure called a "nobleman" who distributes
money. A mina was worth about four months' wages. This nobleman was about to take a
journey to receive an appointment of governance over an area where the residents disliked
him.
As anyone who has held an elective or appointed office should know, your ability to
govern depends on those people you select to carry out your decisions and achieve
success. The distribution of minas is made as a sort of test of support and trust. Unless
you are a Christian, the thing best used to judge trustworthiness is money. This parable
is indeed about money, but also about loyalty. If you didn't have loyal supporters, you
would probably not live long as a leader.
From history of that period, we know that Christ's parable was based upon people we
can identify, and, like the previous parable, we can connect His historic comparison to
the misunderstood beliefs of the early Christians concerning the timing of His kingdom
and events that would eventually take place. This is an interesting story, but we will
continue this parable explanation and save that story for later.
The nobleman travels to Rome to receive his commission from Caesar, counting on
his civil servants to keep control of his territory. How they handle his money will tell him
how loyal they are. We need to understand the word AUSTERE to know the character
of this nobleman, and what he expected from his servants.
The word means strict, stern, cold, dispassionate, rigorous self denial, and generally
somebody not likely to be your best friend. Austere also represents conservatism in the
extreme. This is not a political comment, but you can perhaps understand the strong
feelings it generates and the likelihood of leadership upheaval. You will hear more of this
word, especially as European nations continue with financial decisions.
This nobleman was so disliked, his detractors sent a delegation after him to Rome in
an effort to prevent his appointment. They didn't succeed, and he returned as the new
leader of the area. He then called his servants to him to report their success. It is
interesting to note the nobleman asks how each has gained by trading (Luke 19:15).
The first servant reported his mina had gained 10 minas. He was not rewarded with
money, but with control of 10 cities. The second servant gained five minas, and he was
given control of five cities. The control of cities (political subdivisions) brought with it
money, but more importantly, the support of the people needed to prevent revolt.
The glaring clue in the Parable of the Minas is in verse 26, the same verse number
as in Matt. 25. The nobleman admits (Luke 19:22) "Out of your own mouth I will judge
you, you wicked servant. You knew that I was an austere man, collecting what I did not
deposit and reaping what I did not sow."
Did you again overlook this man broke the commandment about stealing, which he
did for financial gain? Are you accepting that Christ taught stealing was okay? Do you
realize this nobleman's character is such that he would oppress people and do anything
to be the leader? How can a person read over this verse (twice) and not understand?
Now, in verse 27 we see how far this corrupt leader will go to maintain his type of
lifestyle. He takes the one mina from the servant, and orders those who opposed his
reign brought before him and has them slain in front of his eyes.
Back up to verse 26, and consider this message carefully. It is misunderstood by
most Christians and means exactly the opposite of the traditional interpretation. The
traditional interpretation we usually quote is "it takes money to make money". The real
interpretation is a warning for those who understand.
"For I say to you, that to everyone who has will be given; and from him who does not
have, even what he has will be taken away from him." The lust for power and greed will
not stop until the nobleman and his supporters have everything. This process goes on
and on in history. In the Dark Ages, the barons were the noblemen, the politicians under
him bore titles and functions such as tax collectors and sheriffs, and everyone else was
a serf, or common man. The commoners actually existed and had virtually no quality of
life.
As I mentioned previously, the underlying message Christ was delivering foretold how
and when His kingdom would be brought to earth. It wasn't about to happen as soon as
early Christians thought. Christians and non Christians alike would need to understand
things such as the need to be watching (Parable of the Wise and Foolish Virgins, Matt.
25:1-13). There are certain conditions that will dictate how we live leading up to the end
times, and these parables tell us what the conditions are,
Unless you understand the mysteries, you won't have a clue as to the future. You may
dismiss the explanation of the parables, but if you do, you join those who Christ described
in Matt. 13:10-16. To understand, you must apply yourself to diligent study of scripture
and other information. Just reading the bible brings you under the prophecy of Isaiah--
be sure to understand these verses in Matt, 13:14 and 15.
You may still doubt what I have written, but these two parables are important tests of
a Christian's true commitment. The Savior's Prayer is the only answer the Father, Son
and Holy Spirit can honor. You have a choice. Followers of Satan have no choice.
Rev. Walbear
PS--Find us on Faceook at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Faith-Walk-Ministry/230373216976774